Commission Study Expanding Court

On Wednesday, the Judicial Council of California released a report recommending the expansion of the state’s trial court system. The report, which was commissioned by the state’s Legislature in 2016, suggests the creation of two new trial court levels in order to reduce the backlog of cases and improve access to justice.

The proposed new trial court levels would be known as the Superior Court and the Court of Appeal. The Superior Court would hear the most serious criminal and civil cases, while the Court of Appeal would hear appeals from lower court decisions.

The report was compiled by a commission made up of judges, lawyers, and other court professionals. The commission found that the state’s current trial court system is inadequate to meet the needs of California’s growing population. The proposed expansion would help to reduce the backlog of cases and provide better access to justice for all Californians.

The Judicial Council of California will now consider the commission’s report and make a recommendation to the state’s Legislature. If the Legislature approves the report, it will then be sent to the governor for final approval.

Who Can Increase Size of Supreme Court?

There is no specific person or organization who can increase the size of the Supreme Court. The size of the Supreme Court is set by the Constitution, and can only be changed through an amendment.

Can Congress expand the scope of the Supreme Court?

There is no definitive answer to this question, as it depends on a number of factors, including the interpretation of the Constitution. However, there is some historical precedent for Congress expanding the scope of the Supreme Court.

The Constitution does not explicitly give Congress the power to expand the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. However, there are a number of sections that could be interpreted as granting this power. For example, Article III, Section 2 grants Congress the power to establish “such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” This could be interpreted as giving Congress the power to expand the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.

Another section that could be interpreted as granting Congress the power to expand the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is the Appointments Clause in Article II, Section 2. This clause grants the President the power to appoint Supreme Court justices with the “advice and consent” of the Senate. This could be interpreted as giving Congress the power to expand the size of the Supreme Court.

In addition, Congress has the power to pass legislation that affects the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. For example, in 1875, Congress passed a law that allowed the Supreme Court to hear suits between two states. This law was later overturned by the Supreme Court in 1892.

There is no definitive answer to the question of whether Congress can expand the scope of the Supreme Court. However, there is some historical precedent for Congress doing this. In addition, Congress has the power to pass legislation that affects the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.

Can you reduce the size of the Supreme Court?

In the United States, the Supreme Court is the country’s highest court. It has nine justices who serve lifetime appointments. Some people believe that the Supreme Court is too large and should be reduced in size.

Proponents of reducing the size of the Supreme Court argue that a smaller court would be more efficient. They also say that a smaller court would be less expensive to operate.

Opponents of reducing the size of the Supreme Court argue that a smaller court would be less effective. They also say that a smaller court would be less democratic.

Ultimately, the decision about whether or not to reduce the size of the Supreme Court is up to Congress.

Who is on Biden’s Commission on the Supreme Court?

Joe Biden, the Vice President of the United States, has been tasked with creating a commission to find a replacement for Justice Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court. The commission is made up of a bipartisan group of eleven individuals, all of whom have extensive legal backgrounds.

The commission has been criticized by some for being too partisan, as it only includes Democrats and Republicans. However, Biden has stated that he wants the commission to be as bipartisan as possible.

The commission is tasked with finding a replacement for Justice Scalia, who died on February 13, 2016. The commission has until March 16, 2016 to make a recommendation to President Obama.

How can Congress change the number of Supreme Court justices?

How can Congress change the number of Supreme Court justices?

The Constitution of the United States sets the number of Supreme Court justices at nine. Congress can change this number by passing a law.

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States. It has the power to decide questions about the Constitution and the laws of the United States. The Supreme Court is also responsible for interpreting the laws.

The number of justices on the Supreme Court can be changed by Congress. In 1869, Congress passed a law that set the number of justices at nine. In 1937, Congress passed a law that set the number of justices at ten. In 1946, Congress passed a law that set the number of justices at eleven. In 1988, Congress passed a law that set the number of justices at nine.

There are several reasons why Congress might want to change the number of justices on the Supreme Court. One reason might be to make sure that the Supreme Court has enough justices to hear all the cases that come before it. Another reason might be to make sure that the Supreme Court is more evenly divided between Republicans and Democrats.

If Congress wants to change the number of justices on the Supreme Court, it can pass a law to do so. The law would have to be approved by the President.

Why we should expand the Supreme Court?

On January 10, 2017, days before the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States, Senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon proposed a bill to expand the Supreme Court. The bill would add six new justices to the Court, giving liberals a majority they have not had in decades.

Merkley’s proposal is not without precedent. In 1937, Franklin D. Roosevelt attempted to “pack” the Court by appointing more than a dozen new justices, in response to several Court decisions that had struck down New Deal legislation. Roosevelt’s plan was met with strong resistance and ultimately failed.

Since then, there have been several calls to expand the Supreme Court, but Merkley’s proposal is the most concrete and ambitious to date.

There are a number of reasons to support Merkley’s proposal.

First, the current Court is dangerously unbalanced. With only eight justices, the Court often deadlocks on important cases. This happened most recently in June of 2016, when the Court split 4-4 on a case involving President Obama’s immigration policy.

Second, the current Court is too large. There are currently nine justices, and each one takes up a significant amount of time and resources. Merkley’s proposal would reduce the size of the Court to a more manageable number.

Third, the current Court is not reflective of the population. The nine justices are all white and all male. Merkley’s proposal would add three female justices and three justices of color.

Fourth, the current Court is not representative of the country’s political landscape. The five conservatives on the Court were all appointed by Republican presidents, while the four liberals were appointed by Democratic presidents. Merkley’s proposal would add justices who are more reflective of the political makeup of the country.

Finally, the current Court is not representative of the country’s social landscape. The five conservatives on the Court are all wealthy, while the four liberals are all from middle or working-class backgrounds. Merkley’s proposal would add justices who are more representative of the social landscape of the country.

In conclusion, there are many good reasons to support Merkley’s proposal to expand the Supreme Court. The Court is dangerously unbalanced, too large, not reflective of the population, not representative of the political landscape, and not representative of the social landscape. Expanding the Court would address these problems and make the Court more representative of the American people.

Why should the Supreme Court be expanded?

In the United States, the Supreme Court is the highest court in the land. It has nine justices, and is responsible for interpreting the Constitution and ruling on federal cases. The court is currently limited in size, with only nine justices. However, there is a growing movement to expand the Supreme Court to 11 justices.

There are a number of reasons why the Supreme Court should be expanded. First, the current size of the court is inadequate to handle the increasing number of cases that come before it. The court is currently backlogged, with more than 80 cases pending. Adding two more justices would help to alleviate the backlog.

Second, the current size of the court leads to partisan gridlock. With only nine justices, it is possible for a 4-4 tie to occur. This leaves the lower court’s ruling in place, even if it is not in line with Supreme Court precedent. Expanding the court to 11 justices would help to avoid these deadlocks.

Third, the current size of the court can lead to rulings that are not representative of the majority of Americans. With only nine justices, it is possible for a minority of Americans to control the court. Expanding the court to 11 justices would help to ensure that the court’s rulings reflect the views of the majority of Americans.

Finally, expanding the court would help to ensure that the judicial branch is properly staffed. The current size of the court is inadequate to handle the increasing number of cases that come before it. Expanding the court would help to ensure that the judicial branch is properly staffed, and that all Americans have access to justice.

In conclusion, there are a number of reasons why the Supreme Court should be expanded. Expanding the court to 11 justices would help to alleviate the backlog, avoid partisan gridlock, and ensure that the court’s rulings reflect the views of the majority of Americans. It would also help to ensure that the judicial branch is properly staffed.